For a property or a portfolio, a lot of risk is observable in the public record and the geography around it. Amalgament joins hazard, environmental, and property signals to the parcel, so an insurer can ask what risks a property carries, or which properties in a book are exposed.
FEMA and geographic hazard signals, environmental regulatory history, historical events, and property characteristics, joined to the parcel and its surroundings. Enough to answer “what risks are observable from public records at this property.”
Ask about one property, or ask which properties in a portfolio are exposed to a particular hazard. Because everything keys to the parcel spine, a single property lookup and a portfolio sweep use the same layer.
Amalgament is not the pricing model; it is the public-record and geographic context feeding an insurer's underwriting and catastrophe-analytics workflows, so the model works from joined ground truth.
Property records API · Environmental due diligence · Property intelligence
No. It is the public-record and geographic context layer feeding your underwriting and catastrophe models; pricing stays with your models.
Yes. Because signals key to the parcel spine, you can screen a whole portfolio for exposure, not just one property.
FEMA and geographic hazard data plus environmental records, joined to the property and its surroundings.
More solutions: Due diligence · KYB & AML · Sales intelligence · Property intelligence · Commercial real estate · Competitive intelligence · Lending & underwriting · Vendor & third-party risk · Construction & development · Site selection · Environmental due diligence · M&A & private equity · Government contractors · Government & economic development · Investigative research · Law firms