Diligence on a target is a graph problem: the company, its subsidiaries, its locations, its properties, and everything filed against them. Amalgament resolves that graph and returns it in one query, so “what are the public-record risks of this acquisition” starts as an API or MCP call.
Traverse from a target to its subsidiaries, locations, properties, permits, licenses, litigation, regulatory history, and government relationships. Entity resolution ties the graph together, so an asset held under a subsidiary LLC still shows up on the target.
Liens, litigation, bankruptcy, regulatory and environmental actions, and government exclusions across the whole corporate graph, in one pull. The public-record risks of an acquisition, assembled rather than searched.
Pull the target's graph over REST into your diligence workflow, or let an MCP-connected agent assemble a public-record diligence report on the target and its subsidiaries in context.
Entity resolution API · Due diligence · Government spending API
Entity resolution and the corporate graph tie subsidiaries, locations, and ownership together, so signals under a related entity surface on the target.
No. It is the public-record research and context layer that accelerates diligence; legal and financial review stay with your team and advisors.
Yes. Over MCP, an agent can traverse the target's graph and assemble the public-record picture mid-workflow.
More solutions: Due diligence · KYB & AML · Sales intelligence · Property intelligence · Commercial real estate · Competitive intelligence · Lending & underwriting · Vendor & third-party risk · Construction & development · Site selection · Environmental due diligence · Insurance & catastrophe risk · Government contractors · Government & economic development · Investigative research · Law firms