Third-party risk means knowing who you are actually doing business with, and catching it when that changes. Amalgament pulls a vendor's full public record and keeps watching it, so “tell me everything public about this supplier” is a query, and monitoring is automatic.
Corporate status and registration, litigation, bankruptcy, regulatory issues, government exclusions and debarments, environmental actions, locations, and ownership changes, joined to the resolved supplier. The signals a procurement or third-party-risk team needs before onboarding and after.
SAM exclusions and debarment lists attach to the resolved entity, so screening asks “is this actual vendor excluded” rather than fuzzy-matching a name. That is the difference between a real flag and noise.
Vendors change. Amalgament attaches new filings, litigation, and exclusions to the entity as they land, so a third-party-risk program can monitor a whole supplier base instead of re-checking by hand.
Sanctions & watchlists API · Business records API · Entity resolution API
A questionnaire is self-reported and static; Amalgament is the independent public record, resolved to the entity and refreshed, so you verify rather than trust.
Yes. SAM exclusions and debarments attach to the resolved vendor, so a flagged supplier surfaces even under a name variant.
Yes. Because records attach to a stable entity id, you can watch many vendors for new signals over time via the API or an MCP agent.
More solutions: Due diligence · KYB & AML · Sales intelligence · Property intelligence · Commercial real estate · Competitive intelligence · Lending & underwriting · Construction & development · Site selection · Environmental due diligence · M&A & private equity · Insurance & catastrophe risk · Government contractors · Government & economic development · Investigative research · Law firms